Network Speed Test Software
LAN Speed Test is designed to be a rock solid tool to measure your file transfer and network speeds (wired & wireless) easily and accurately. It does this. Network speed test Software - Free Download network speed test - Top 4 Download - Top4Download.com offers free software downloads for Windows, Mac, iOS and Android.
Sorry for bumping an old topic, but I found this from Google. I'm looking to achieve a gigabit connection. My speed, according to this test is 305Mbps.
The cable I use to connect to my router, I've had for probably 6 years, I got basically a crossover cable, which I think in my case is a Cat5e. If I were to replace it with a Cat6, what am I to expect, speed wise? Mind you, my PC's CPU is a E6750 with a SATA II HDD. Not sure how much that comes into play. I also have Verizon FiOS, and have a LAN-TO-LAN setup (Actiontec to Asus router). I want Gigabit speed to my ASUS router (which I'm currently wired into. The cable will make no difference.
Cat5e is designed to run 1g. Even if you were to buy cat7 cable it would run no faster.
The speed of the data though the wire is the same it is based on some fraction of the speed of light based on using copper. Very technically it takes longer in cat7 cable because there is a tiny bit more wire because of the twists but only a very obsessive person would even attempt to calculate this because it can't be detected in actual use. The difference is not the speed of the media it is how much data you encode into the signal. This is controlled by the interfaces. If you had 10g interfaces better cable will allow you to use a different encoding method. But 1g interfaces will still use the 1g encoding method on even on better cable. It is the interface that controls the amount of data that is sent not the cable.
If you have 1g interfaces on your devices the data is ALWAYS transmitted at 1g/sec. The issue is how it is reported on end machines. So lets say i have 1gbit of data to send. It must be send in 1 second since that is the way the ports work and if they computer would look right at the end of that 1 sec it would see 1gbit/sec.
But lets say it only looks every 10 sec now the rate is 100mbit/sec because I send data at 1gbit for 1 second and transmitted nothing for 9 seconds so my average time is only 100mbit/sec. In real machine obviously it check more often that 10 sec but you are also sending data chunks that are much smaller also. The key problem is why the machine would send data for 1 second and then send nothing for 9. This is almost always due to things like file structures or disk or something along that line. The only way a cable would be the issue if you were getting errors which requires the data to be resent.
Some nic cards will display the number of errors you get. It should be a very small number maybe 1 or 2 a week and that would be kinda high. So if you are getting errors on the ports a new cable might help. You no longer need cross cables when you use gig.
Not sure if they hurt anything but don't spend extra for them since the concept does not even exist at gig speed. There is a even simpler tool called IPERF. It is a old line mode tool.
It runs completely from memory and is extremely tiny in size. It does not even use disk or much cpu so it try to eliminate delays caused by the end devices. It is doing raw data transfer without using any of the microsoft or other file protocols which slow things down.
This tool is extremely basic and therefore is a good measure. You want both your pc you are testing to connected to lan ports, any wireless will greatly degrade your speed. You can likely get close to 900mbit/sec.
SpeedOf.me's HTML5-based network speed test recorded the fastest download rate of dozens of tests run at different testing sites. Screenshot by Dennis O'Reilly/CNET Are you getting all the network bandwidth you're paying for? Good luck trying to find out. As Rani Molla reported recently in the, some ISPs are delivering download speeds up to 41 percent slower than they advertise. The figures were compiled by speed-test service Ookla, which owns. According to Ookla's figures, the folks in Idaho Falls, Idaho, realize only half the download speed their ISPs claim to provide.
Internet users in London, Ky.; Huntington, W. Va.; and Odessa, Texas, don't fare much better: all receive information over their network at speeds far below what their ISPs promise.
Network Speed Test Software Review
The slowest download speed test result from DSLReports.com was a fraction of the rate promised by my ISP. Screenshot by Dennis O'Reilly/CNET Rerunning the DSLReports.com download speed test generated a result more than 10 times faster than earlier tests. Screenshot by Dennis O'Reilly/CNET When I tested more than a half-dozen network speed calculators, the results varied by a factor greater than 10: the lowest reported download speed was a snail's-pace 783Kbps using 's Flash-based test.
Another test using the same service resulted in a download speed reading of 11.237Mbps. The highest download speed test result I recorded was 13.06Mbps using the HTML5-based test at SpeedOf.me (shown at the top of this post). However, the same test generated a download speed of 4.87Mbps on the connection two days later. (For the record, my ISP promises download speeds up to 12Mbps. I ran the tests in both Firefox and Google Chrome on a Windows 8.1 laptop; many of the services also test phone network speeds, but I didn't run any of them.) A subsequent download speed test at SpeedOf.me recorded a much slower rate than a test conducted days earlier. Screenshot by Dennis O'Reilly/CNET Conversely, the results of the upload tests at the various services were consistently at or just under 2Mbps. The exceptions were upload-test results at DSLReports.com, whose testing was so inconsistent I ended up discarding all of the service's results.
![Speed Speed](https://oceanofapk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Internet-Speed-Test-Pro-APK-Download-For-Free.png)
I ran the tests at DSLReports.com about a dozen times: three times the download results were under 1Mbps, five times they were between 1Mbps and 4Mbps, twice they were around 8Mbps, and three times the download speed the test reported topped 10Mbps. Does the type of speed test make a difference? Many experts claim HTML5-based speed tests are more accurate than tests that use Java and Adobe Flash. Others point out that multithread tests such as those used by Ookla (Speedtest.net and branded by many ISPs) don't represent real-world network traffic as well as single-thread tests. The most consistent test results were recorded at Speakeasy's Flash-based and at 's HTML5-based tester.
Of course, the services' tests may be consistently wrong. After running several tests over a span of days, all of Speed Test's download results were within a few kilobits of 11.5Mbps. TestMy.net's download scores in both its single- and multithread tests exhibited a bit more range than those of Speakeasy's Speed Test, but they averaged about 11.2Mbps. The results of the HTML5-based speed tests conducted at ranged from 5Mbps to 11Mbps, those at exhibited a similar range, and the Flash-based tests at ZDNet's recorded speeds from 5.8Mbps to 11.4Mbps. Related Articles. Not surprisingly, the highest consistent speeds were reported when I ran the tests offered by my ISP, AT&T. The company's speed tests are provided by Ookla, as are the tests at many other network providers.
(Note that the Java-based network tester at the FCC's runs on the Measurement Labs platform, which doesn't support the Safari, Google Chrome, or Opera browsers. The FCC's test also requires that you supply your street address.) With only one exception, all the download tests I ran at the and at Ookla's Speedtest.net indicated speeds of 11.5Mbps or greater.
One of the dozen-or-so tests recorded a download speed of 10.4Mbps, and several of Ookla's Flash-based test results exceeded 12.5Mbps for downloads. After conducting more than 100 network speed tests from many different providers over the course of several days, I'm confident my ISP is delivering speeds approximating - and perhaps exceeding - those it promised when I signed up for the service. Whether any of the speed tests I tried truly represent real-world network traffic is debatable. HTML5-based speed tests such as those offered by SpeedOf.me and TestMy.net seem to have an advantage in that they require no additional software. If you suspect you're paying for more bandwidth than you're actually getting, you needn't trust your ISP's test results to make your case - especially if you happen to live in one of your service's dead zones. Hello, Pocatello!